AIECS 2026Belgrade · 14–15 November 2026Admin login
Menu

Conference contributor

Batoul Wael Shako

Maaref University of Applied Sciences

Biography

Biography pending.

Conference contributions 1

THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE ALGORITHM:

Does AI lead us to 'creative laziness' and the loss of sovereignty over human imagination......beyond simulation: does AI possess 'creative consciousness' or is it merely a mirror of human imagination?

Batoul Wael Shako1

This research presents a bold critique of the integration of Artificial Intelligence into creative domains, exploring the concept of "creative atrophy." It argues that the burgeoning reliance on generative models fosters a "digital dictatorship" that exerts control over human taste and constrains the horizons of original thought. ​By examining the human transition from "creator" to "prompt manager," the study investigates the erosion of cognitive sovereignty over imagination. Furthermore, it warns that delegating the tasks of visualization and innovation to machines threatens to diminish human creativity into a mere echo of statistical data. The paper concludes with a call for "intellectual resistance" to safeguard the biological essence of imagination, seeking to pivot the discourse from "how to use AI" toward "how to ensure the survival of our creativity" as a distinct species in an era of comprehensive automation......This research aims to explore the demarcation between innate human creativity and the generative outputs of Artificial Intelligence. Against the backdrop of the rapid evolution of deep neural networks, the study poses a fundamental question: Can algorithms be regarded as independent creative agents, or do they remain sophisticated tools that merely mirror and simulate the human data upon which they were trained? The research addresses the ethical challenges concerning authenticity and intellectual property, with a specific focus on the concept of "social responsibility" toward preserving human creative identity in the age of automation. The paper concludes by offering a critical perspective on achieving a balanced integration that ensures the utilization of machine capabilities without marginalizing the human imagination